ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2025
Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders and veterans: Flexing the approach with explicit case formulation.
Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders and veterans: Flexing the approach with explicit case formulation.Journal of traumatic stress · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to improve psychological interventions for first responders and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted an open trial integrating explicit case formulation (CF) within cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in a sample primarily composed of first responders (N = 29). Participants attended weekly CPT sessions with explicit CF, where CF guided deviations (if required) from standard CPT delivery (CPT-CF). PTSD diagnosis and self-reported PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and quality of life utility scores were key variables assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up for all participants. Of the 28 participants who started therapy, 23 completed treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated significant reductions and sizeable effects at posttreatment for clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD outcomes, g = 2.48-2.50, and self-reported depressive symptoms, g = 1.37, and quality of life, g = 0.99. Effects for secondary variables ranged from small (alcohol misuse: g = 0.32) to large (sleep, g = 0.71; anger, g = 0.74; unhelpful trauma beliefs: g = 1.11). Clinical gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Among the 23 participants available at follow-up, 82.6% (n = 19) met good end-state functioning for PTSD, and none met the criteria for PTSD. Seven participants had moderate-to-major deviations from CPT during treatment but largely demonstrated similar outcomes to those who did not. The study replicates prior CPT-CF work among civilians, finding it to be acceptable to participants and not diluting positive outcomes of standard CPT. Future research requires randomized trials and an expansion of this approach with other trauma populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.