Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947598›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Integrating Machine Learning with Flow-Imaging Microscopy for Automated Monitoring of Algal Blooms.

Farhan Khan, Benjamin Gincley, Andrea Busch, Dienye L Tolofari, John W Norton, Emily Varga, R Michael McKay, Miguel Fuentes-Cabrera, Tad Slawecki, Ameet J Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Farhan KhanSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-8609
Benjamin GincleySchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8824-7144
Andrea BuschGreat Lakes Water Authority, Detroit, Michigan 48226, United States.
Dienye L TolofariGreat Lakes Water Authority, Detroit, Michigan 48226, United States.
John W NortonGreat Lakes Water Authority, Detroit, Michigan 48226, United States.
Emily VargaGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada.
R Michael McKayGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2723-5371
Miguel Fuentes-CabreraKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Oakland, California 94613, United States.
Tad SlaweckiLimnoTech, Incorporated, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, United States.
Ameet J PintoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1089-5664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time monitoring of phytoplankton in freshwater systems is critical for early detection of harmful algal blooms (HABs) to enable efficient response by water management agencies. This manuscript presents an image processing pipeline developed to adapt ARTiMiS, a low-cost automated flow-imaging device, for real-time algal monitoring in natural freshwater systems. This pipeline addresses several challenges associated with autonomous imaging of aquatic samples, such as flow-imaging artifacts (i.e., out-of-focus and background objects), as well as strategies to efficiently identify novel objects that are not represented in the training data set; the latter is a common challenge with the application of deep learning approaches for image classification in environmental systems. The pipeline leverages a random forest model to identify out-of-focus particles with an accuracy of 89% and a custom background particle detection algorithm to identify and remove particles that erroneously appear in consecutive images with >97 ± 2.8% accuracy. Furthermore, a convolutional neural network (CNN), trained to classify taxonomical classes, achieved 95% accuracy in a closed set classification. Nonetheless, the supervised closed-set classifiers struggled with the accurate classification of objects when challenged with novel particles, which are common in complex natural environments; this limits real-time monitoring applications by requiring extensive manual oversight. To mitigate this, three methods incorporating classification with rejection were tested to improve model precision by flagging irrelevant or unknown classes. Combined, these advances present a fully integrated, end-to-end solution for real-time HAB monitoring in natural freshwater systems, which enhances the scalability of automated detection in dynamic aquatic environments.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringHarmful Algal BloomMachine LearningFresh WaterImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerPhytoplanktonbackground particleflow-imaging microscopyfreshwater ecosystemsHAB monitoringmicroalgaeopenset classificationout-of-distribution

Identifiers

PMID40947598
PMCPMC12461937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.