Trial reportInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025
Efficacy of Open-Ended Urinary Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCatheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is a common postoperative complication following urological procedures, causing significant distress and reducing patient satisfaction. Although pharmacological interventions have been investigated, a more definitive approach is warranted. This study evaluated whether an open-ended Foley catheter (OEFC) reduces the incidence and severity of CRBD compared with a conventional Foley catheter (FC). MATERIALS: In this exploratory, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at Hiroshima University Hospital, 100 patients undergoing transurethral resection of a bladder tumor or robot-assisted surgery for renal, renal pelvic, or ureteral malignancies were randomized 1:1 to receive either an OEFC or a standard FC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CRBD at 6 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included the incidence and severity of CRBD and urethral pain, and the frequency of pharmacological intervention at predefined postoperative time points.
resultsNinety-four patients were included in the full analysis set (47 per group). At 6 h postoperatively, CRBD incidence was significantly lower in the OEFC group than in the FC group (42.6% vs. 68.1%; p = 0.012). The OEFC group consistently demonstrated reduced CRBD incidence and severity compared with the FC group during the first 6 h. Urethral pain scores and analgesic use were comparable between groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that the preventive effect of OEFC was particularly notable in non-transurethral resection of bladder tumor patients.
conclusionsOEFC placement represents a broadly applicable and effective strategy to reduce CRBD following urological surgery. Catheter tip design appears to play a pivotal role in CRBD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.