Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947493›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental education2026

Evaluation of a Curriculum Embedded Weight Stigma Education Module in Dentistry and Oral Health Therapy Programs.

Zanab Malik, Kathryn Williams, Dileep Sharma, Wei Xuan, Deborah Cockrell, Clare E Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zanab MalikSchool of Health Sciences (Oral Health), College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-8029
Kathryn WilliamsNepean Blue Mountains Family Metabolic Health Service, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia.
Dileep SharmaSchool of Health Sciences (Oral Health), College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Wei XuanIngham Institute, South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Deborah CockrellSchool of Health Sciences (Oral Health), College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Clare E CollinsSchool of Health Sciences (Nutrition and Dietetics), College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2009340National Health and Medical Research Council L3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions to reduce weight stigma in the dental setting are limited.

aimsTo evaluate the impact of a weight stigma educational module in an oral health student population on self-reported weight stigma.

methodsAll final year dentistry and oral health therapy (OHT) students and first-year OHT students at two Australian universities were invited to participate. An introductory lecture on obesity in dentistry and pre-intervention survey to assess baseline weight stigma was given to all students; this was followed by the intervention-a healthcare professional educational module on both obesity science and patient experience of obesity, designed to reduce weight stigma. Participant post-intervention surveys assessed weight stigma and attitudes and beliefs regarding obesity.

resultsOf the 217 students who attended the lecture and participated in the pre-intervention survey, 128 students (n = 90 OHT; n = 38 dentistry) completed all components of the study (educational module and post-intervention survey). Post-intervention, participants reported understanding factors beyond personal control contributing to obesity (92.2%) and that tailored approaches to treatment are needed (84.4%) using evidence-based, person-centered care for people living with obesity (85.9%). They agreed on the importance of healthcare practitioners acknowledging weight stigma to improve care (89.1%). Despite this, 21.9% still agreed/strongly agreed that people living with obesity should control their body weight better. From the post-intervention survey scores, dentistry and final year students had significantly lower total weight stigma scores than OHT and first-year students (p < 0.05). Regarding evaluation for usefulness, relevance and likelihood to recommend to others, the module scored highly, with average scores ≥ 7.9/10 for all three indicators.

conclusionsA weight stigma educational module was felt to be useful and relevant among dental and OHT students but did not fully address issues of individual blame relating to the causes of obesity. The study provides support for the inclusion of obesity and weight stigma education within dental curricula, however, indicates the need for multifaceted interventions to address the complex drivers of obesity stigma.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, DentalObesitySocial StigmaAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleStudents, DentalYoung Adultdentistryeducational moduleobesityoral health therapyweight stigma intervention

Identifiers

PMID40947493
PMCPMC13280427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.