Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947458›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive review of diagnostic, surveillance, and treatment response prediction and assessment.

Kumi Ozaki, Yukichi Tanahashi, Satoshi Goshima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kumi OzakiDepartment of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. ozakik-rad@umin.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-7512
Yukichi TanahashiDepartment of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
Satoshi GoshimaDepartment of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a pivotal imaging modality in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management, offering unique advantages owing to its hepatocyte-specific contrast properties. Its technical foundation includes optimized dynamic phase imaging and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) acquisition, which together provide functional information unattainable with conventional extracellular contrast agents. This modality enhances sensitivity in detecting HCC and enables superior characterization of focal liver lesions based on hepatocyte-specific uptake patterns. In high-risk patients with chronic liver disease, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI facilitates the early detection of small and early-stage HCCs, enabling timely intervention and potentially improving clinical outcomes. Beyond diagnosis, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI aids in predicting treatment response by evaluating tumor biological characteristics. Key imaging biomarkers include: hyperintense or heterogeneous HCC on HBP, suggesting tumor immune microenvironment; peritumoral hypointensity on HBP, suggesting microvascular invasion; and clear hypointensity on HBP with several other findings, indicating vessels encapsulating tumor clusters, characteristic of the macrotrabecular-massive HCC subtype. These biomarkers support a comprehensive evaluation of histological differentiation and biological aggressiveness. Furthermore, this modality demonstrates superior accuracy in assessing local therapy effectiveness and monitoring systemic treatment responses compared to conventional imaging. Major international hepatology societies have incorporated gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI into their HCC diagnostic algorithms, albeit with regional differences in emphasis. Eastern guidelines (e.g., from the Japan Society of Hepatology and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver) prioritize sensitivity, whereas Western guidelines (e.g., from the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) emphasize specificity. Despite certain limitations, including potential suboptimal arterial phase visualization, challenges in interpreting the transitional phase, higher cost, and longer examination times, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI remains an indispensable tool in precision oncology, enabling personalized treatment strategies and supporting optimal patient outcomes through comprehensive HCC characterization and accurate treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAImage EnhancementLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLiverTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGadoxetic acidHepatobiliary phaseHepatocellular carcinomaLiver Imaging Reporting and Data SystemMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40947458
PMCPMC12769691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.