ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Can
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim is to investigate the correlation between renal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), molecular kidney volume (MKV), and total kidney uptake (TKU), which are indicators of the PSMA kidney uptake pattern in
methodsThe study included 196 patients with prostate cancer who underwent
resultsWhen comparing eGFR, BUN, and creatinine values with PET/CT renal parameters, a significant correlation was found between eGFR and MKV (r = 0.397), TKU (r = 0.271), and CT-KV (r = 0.216). Similar correlations were also observed for BUN and creatinine. When patients were grouped based on eGFR values, Group 1 (eGFR > 90; normal) included 75 patients, Group 2 (eGFR: 89-60; mild reduction) included 98 patients, and Group 3 (eGFR: 59-30; moderate reduction) included 21 patients. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of TKU, MKV, and CT-KV. In post-hoc analyses, the most significant parameter was MKV.
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
40947457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.