ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Bioelectronic Interfaces and Sensors for Neural Organoids.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering graphene oxide interfaces for electrochemical biosensing of biomolecules, cells, and organoids.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Strategies for Neural Repair and Regeneration: Neural Organoid Transplantation in the CNS.Cell proliferation · 2026Review
- Organoid Brain-Machine-Interface Devices for Central Nervous System Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Janus Synapses as Modular Neurointerfaces.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Review
- AI-Integrated Micro/Nanorobots for Biomedical Applications: Recent Advances in Design, Fabrication, and Functions.Biosensors · 2025Review
- UnravelingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural organoids are emerging as promising in vitro models, offering a unique platform to partially recapitulate the structural and functional complexity of the human nervous system. These three-dimensional (3D) constructs, which mimic key aspects of organ architecture, can be reliably derived from pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Their ability to faithfully model neural development and disease pathogenesis has positioned them as indispensable tools in neuroscience research. However, to further unleash their potential, there is a pressing need for long-term and stable monitoring of their dynamic functions in a 3D context. This review provides a brief overview on diverse types of neural organoids and their induction protocols. We further highlight recent advancements in bioelectronic interfaces and sensors tailored for 3D culture. Finally, we discuss future directions aimed at advanced methodologies for real-time, multidimensional functional analysis, ultimately paving the way for breakthroughs in understanding neural development and pathology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.