Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947435›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025

Generalized additive mixed models to discern data-driven theoretically informed strategies for public brain, cognitive and mental health.

Laurenz Lammer, Frauke Beyer, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Julia Sacher, Heide Glaesmer, Arno Villringer, A Veronica Witte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurenz LammerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. lammer@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-4924
Frauke BeyerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-852X
Steffi Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-6090
Julia SacherDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-0558
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-7653
Arno VillringerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-2404
A Veronica WitteDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-6688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social isolation is recognized as a public health emergency. However, major guidelines provide vastly different recommendations on how to target it, and no strategy has been substantiated on firm theoretical or empirical grounds, yet. Rose's seminal The Strategy of Preventive Medicine provided a theoretical framework for such arbitrations between approaches. Therein, determining the shape of the relationship between risk factor and outcome is of paramount importance. However, quantitative approaches immediately applying this theory to evidence are still lacking. Thus, in this pre-registered analysis, we pursued a novel approach and employed generalized additive mixed models to model the shape of social isolation's Links to brain, cognitive and mental health outcomes in a well-characterised population-based sample. We derived brain measures from 3T MRIs, assessed cognitive functions with extensive neuropsychological testing and measured social isolation and mental health outcomes using established questionnaires. Overall, we studied over 10,000 (mean age 58a, 53% women) participants at baseline and over 5500 (mean age 64a, 53% women) at follow-up after ~ 6 years. The relationship of social contact with almost all outcomes was firmly linear and did not differ above and below the standard threshold for social isolation. Only for processing speed did we detect a steeper slope amongst socially isolated individuals. Hence, most of the health effects of social contact were observed in individuals that would not be categorised as socially isolated. Applying advanced statistical methods to a large and well-characterised dataset we provide evidence in support of a shift in focus away from individual-level and towards population-level preventive approaches.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionMental HealthSocial IsolationAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPublic HealthRisk FactorsAnxietyBrain healthCognitive healthDementiaDepressionEpidemiologyGeneralized additive mixed modelsPublic healthSocial connectionSocial isolationStrategy of preventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID40947435
PMCPMC12695978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.