Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947424›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Bayesian Adaptive Enrichment Design for Continuous Biomarkers.

Yue Tu, Yusha Liu, Wendy J Mack, Lindsay A Renfro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue TuDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Yusha LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Wendy J MackDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Lindsay A RenfroDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4306-1896

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NIH HHS U10CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of precision medicine and targeted therapies in cancer, new challenges in the statistical design of clinical trials have naturally emerged. Most randomized clinical trial designs incorporating predictive biomarkers (those associated with treatment efficacy) assume biomarkers are dichotomous, or dichotomize naturally continuous biomarkers upfront, or find cut points mid-way through the trial to classify patients as biomarker-positive or biomarker-negative. However, these practices ignore or discard information about continuous and possible nonlinear or non-monotone prognostic or predictive effects. In this article, we propose a novel adaptive enrichment trial design to handle continuous biomarkers with any effect shape, including Bayesian marker-adaptive randomization. We demonstrate that this design can correctly make marker-specific trial decisions with high efficiency, resulting in improved performance and patient-centered decisions compared to adaptive cut-point selection approaches without adaptive randomization that further ignore or oversimplify true underlying marker relationships.

Indexed as

BiomarkersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignBayes TheoremBiomarkers, TumorComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumoradaptive enrichment designadaptive randomizationBayesian adaptive designbiomarker‐driven designclinical trialprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40947424
PMCPMC13215621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.