ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Mismatch Negativity in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: No Evidence of Progressive Decline.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mismatch Negativity in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: No Evidence of Progressive Decline.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Correction to "Mismatch Negativity in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: No Evidence of Progressive Decline".The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duration-deviant mismatch negativity has been investigated as a potential biomarker for predicting early psychosis clinical outcomes. Although progressive mismatch negativity changes have been linked to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline after psychosis onset, it is unclear whether similar changes occur in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis. Therefore, we examined longitudinal mismatch negativity changes and their associations with cognition and functioning in 24 clinical high risk for psychosis individuals and 22 healthy controls. Participants underwent duration-deviant mismatch negativity recordings at baseline and the 1-2-year follow-up. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed via Trail Making Test parts A and B, and general functioning was measured with the Global Assessment of Functioning scale. Group differences in mismatch negativity amplitude change over time were evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of covariance, and its associations with cognitive and functional changes were assessed via Spearman correlations. Compared with healthy controls, individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis had significantly reduced mismatch negativity amplitudes at the FCz electrode site at baseline. However, there was no significant group-by-time interaction in mismatch negativity amplitude, nor were its changes significantly correlated with neurocognitive or general functioning changes, suggesting that progressive changes in duration-deviant mismatch negativity may not occur prior to psychosis onset in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Given the heterogeneous outcomes in the clinical high risk for psychosis population, larger samples and longer follow-up durations are needed to elucidate the clinical significance of duration-deviant mismatch negativity in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.