ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhythmic alternate prioritization in auditory feature-based attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Correction to "Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention".The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that sensory information in the visual and auditory domains is processed not in a continuous but in a rather rhythmically fluctuating fashion, reflecting underlying oscillations in neural excitability. So far, little is known about whether a similar mechanism is also implemented in the somatosensory modality, which, given its importance for monitoring and protecting our bodily integrity, might sample sensory input differently. Here, we investigated (1) whether tactile detection performance fluctuates over time at the speed of somatosensory alpha- and beta-band oscillations and (2) whether attention samples two simultaneously monitored body parts at different time points, similar to previous demonstrations in the visual and auditory domains. Thirty-one human participants (female and male) performed a behavioral dense-sampling experiment, consisting of a tactile cuing task, in which they responded to tactile vibrations at detection threshold presented to the left or right index fingers. In line with our hypotheses, we observed temporal fluctuations in both hit rates and response times, at a speed of 8-16 Hz, consistent with electrophysiological alpha- and beta-band oscillations commonly observed over somatosensory areas. Further, hit rate fluctuations exhibited phase differences at ~13 Hz between the left and right hands, suggesting that somatosensory spatial attention samples cued and uncued locations at different points in time. Overall, along with recent work, which identified markers of attentional sampling also beyond sensory processing, our study provides novel evidence that cyclical information processing and alternating sampling of simultaneously attended entities might be a general mechanism in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.