Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947136›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025

Safety Listening in High-Risk Situations: A Qualitative Analysis of Responses to Safety Voice in Aviation.

Alyssa M Pandolfo, Tom W Reader, Alex Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Safety Listening in High-Risk Situations: A Qualitative Analysis of Responses to Safety Voice in Aviation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alyssa M PandolfoDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-496X
Tom W ReaderDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-6388
Alex GillespieDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0162-1269

Funding

London School of Economics and Political Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safety listening-responses to voice acts aimed at preventing harm-can avert organizational failures like airplane crashes. Research often focuses on attitudes and perceptions of listening using self-report measures; consequently, little is known about how safety listening occurs behaviorally and influences safety outcomes in high-risk situations. Using directed and summative content analysis, we analyzed 45 transcripts of flightdeck communication before crashes and near misses to develop a framework of safety listening behavior in risky contexts. We also used abductive top-down theorizing to identify the processes through which such behaviors prevent harm. We propose that effective safety listening behaviors engage with voice through action and sensemaking, whereas ineffective listening behaviors dismiss or exhibit token engagement with speaking-up. Our analysis illustrates that engaging with voice enables teams to develop shared and accurate situation awareness of emerging risks, thus potentially averting accidents. Our findings demonstrate the importance of a behavioral approach to safety listening, illustrating that assessing listener engagement with safety voice-rather than attitudes-can provide an accurate and practical explanation for how safety listening influences organizational safety outcomes.

Indexed as

Accidents, AviationAviationCommunicationSafetySafety ManagementHumansaccident | safety listening | safety voice | team situation awareness

Identifiers

PMID40947136
PMCPMC12663909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.