Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947123›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

How to Codesign Infographics to Teach Clinical Skills.

Vanessa Otti, Neil Clough, Faye Gishen, Michele Russell, Rashmi G Mathew

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vanessa OttiMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Neil CloughMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Faye GishenUniversity College London, London, UK.
Michele RussellMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rashmi G MathewMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We outline the 10-step process that we used to codesign infographics to teach ophthalmic clinical skills. Infographics were designed to complement preexisting resources. Drawing on educational theories such as Dual Coding and Multimedia Learning, we demonstrate how infographics can enhance engagement, understanding, and recall. We adopted a copedagogical approach by involving medical students, clinical educators, and curriculum leads from the outset. Copedagogy supports collaboration and can improve the quality of education. Our approach incorporated medical student perspectives with focus groups and the audience participation application 'Slido'; this enhanced the relevance of our infographics and helped foster deeper student engagement and learning. We highlight the importance of inclusivity by aligning our designs with Universal Design for Learning principles and best practices for accessibility. Although copedagogy may be time intensive, we found it highly rewarding, with benefits for all stakeholders. Through this How To paper, we hope to encourage others to create visually engaging, inclusive, and learner-centred resources that align with modern educational needs.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, MedicalOphthalmologyCurriculumFocus GroupsHumansLearningStudents, MedicalTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40947123
PMCPMC12433735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.