Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947118›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2025

Do Specialized Medical LLMs Demand a Radically New Approach Under the EU's Medical Device Regulation?

Hannah Louise Smith, W Nicholson Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah Louise SmithCentre for Advanced Studies in Bioscience Innovation Law, Faculty of Law, https://ror.org/035b05819University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8054-7721
W Nicholson PriceCentre for Advanced Studies in Bioscience Innovation Law, Faculty of Law, https://ror.org/035b05819University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0729-290X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the arguments made by Onitiu and colleagues concerning the need to adopt a "backward-walking logic" to manage the risks arising from the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) adapted for a medical purpose. We examine what lessons can be learned from existing multi-use technologies and applied to specialized LLMs, notwithstanding their novelty, and explore the appropriate respective roles of device providers and regulators within the ecosystem of technological oversight.

Indexed as

Equipment and SuppliesGovernment RegulationLanguageMedical Device LegislationEuropean UnionHumansAI governanceArtificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelsMedical Device RegulationPractice of MedicineRisk Management

Identifiers

PMID40947118
PMCPMC12912827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.