ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the German National Cohort (NAKO): Automated segmentation of short-axis cine images and post-processing quality control.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Right Ventricular Adaptability to Pressure Overloading for Critical Therapeutic Decision-Making Processes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prospective, multicenter German National Cohort (NAKO) provides a unique dataset of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images. Effective processing of these images requires a robust segmentation and quality control pipeline.
methodsA deep learning model for semantic segmentation, based on the nnU-Net architecture, was applied to full-cycle short-axis cine images from 29,908 baseline participants. The primary objective was to determine data on structure and function for both ventricles (LV, RV), including end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes, and LV myocardial mass. Statistical and visual quality control was performed, including an expert assessment of outliers in morphofunctional parameters, inter- and intra-ventricular phase differences, and LV time-volume curves (TVC). These were adjudicated using a five-point rating scale, ranging from five (excellent) to one (non-diagnostic), with ratings of three or lower subject to exclusion. The predictive value of outlier criteria for inclusion and exclusion was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics analysis.
resultsThe segmentation model generated complete data for 29,609 of 29,908 participants (99.0%), of whom 5082 (17.0%) underwent visual assessment. Quality assurance yielded a final sample of 26,899 (89.9%) participants with excellent or good quality, excluding 1875 participants due to image quality issues and 835 participants due to segmentation quality issues. TVC was the strongest single discriminator between included and excluded participants (AUC: 0.684). Of the two-category combinations, the pairing of TVC and phases provided the greatest improvement over TVC alone (AUC difference: 0.044; p<0.001). The best performance was observed when all three categories were combined (AUC: 0.748). By extending the quality-controlled sample to include mid-level "acceptable" quality ratings, a total of 28,413 (95.0%) participants could be included.
conclusionThe implemented pipeline enabled automated segmentation of an extensive CMR dataset and integrated thorough quality control measures, providing a comprehensive and reliable data resource for quantitative analyses with diminished risk of bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.