SynthesisPoultry science2025
Antimicrobial resistance in meat and meat products from Asia: An urgent one health challenge- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial resistance in poultry meat in the mediterranean region: prevalence, public health implications, and control strategies: A review.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Spatial distribution and determinants of antimicrobial resistance in livestock across pathogen types, animal species and antimicrobial classes.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Antibiotic Residues in Meat and Animal Feed and Their Association with Antimicrobial Resistance: Evidence from the Kostanay Region, Kazakhstan.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Bacterial Pathogens: Resistance Patterns, Zoonotic Risks and One Health Implications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Serotype Distribution of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Virus in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing demand for animal protein poses a significant public health challenge because of the associated burden of foodborne diseases and antimicrobial resistance.
objectiveThis study aimed to address the pooled prevalence of bacterial pathogens and their AMR patterns with associated genes found in meat and its products across Asia.
methodsOne hundred thirty-four relevant studies published between 2015 and 2025 were identified using major scientific electronic databases and selected on the basis of the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted in Microsoft Excel, and STATA (v19) and R programming (v4.4.2) were used for the analyses. A random effects model was applied for the pooled prevalence at the 95 % CI to account for substantial heterogeneity.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Klebsiella spp., Campylobacter spp., and Enterococcus spp. isolates from the meat and meat products were 49.6 %, 31.7 %, 38.1 %, 21.3 %, 30.7 %, and 46.9 %, respectively. The highest prevalence of isolated bacteria was from pigeons (39.3 %), followed by chickens. Similarly, E. coli was the most frequent pathogen and was highly resistant to ampicillin (79.7 %). S. aureus (84.7 %) and Klebsiella spp. (97.7 %) also exhibited strong resistance to ampicillin, while Salmonella spp. showed high resistance to oxytetracycline (71.3 %). Moreover, the most prevalent AMR genes across the studies were tetA, blaTEM, blaCTX, sul1, blaSHV, and mcr1.
conclusionThe findings revealed increasing pathogen resistance to common antibiotics, highlighting the need for better antibiotic stewardship, monitoring, public awareness, and effective treatment strategies to address this growing threat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.