ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Patient-controlled analgesia with droperidol and H
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction in elderly orthopedic patients: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the incidence and risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) with fentanyl, droperidol, and H1 antihistamine (PCA-DH) after laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Previous studies showed differing PONV incidence and risk factors between IVPCA containing droperidol (PCA-D) and that containing H
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia and received PCA-DH. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between PONV and patient characteristics, anesthetic factors, and prophylactic antiemetic use.
resultsAmong 3832 patients, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and rescue antiemetic use was 14.6%, 4.0%, and 5.5%, respectively-lower than previously reported rates in PCA-D (36.6%, 17.6%, 17.7%) and PCA-H (26.5%, 8.7%, 11.0%). Additionally, the risk factors for PONV in PCA-DH differed from those identified in PCA-D and PCA-H studies.
conclusionIVPCA with both droperidol and H
Indexed as
Identifiers
40946264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.