ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2025
Exploring Facilitators and Barriers for Personalized Dietary Incentives Among Online Shoppers at Cardiovascular Risk and Key Informants to Inform an Automated Shopping Platform.
Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lessons from Smart Cart 2.0: Considerations for Integrating Purchasing Data into Healthy Eating Interventions with AI Approaches.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify preferences, facilitators, and barriers to healthy eating and using a personalized diet application (Smart Cart 2.0) for online grocery shopping.
methodsConvergent, parallel multimethods study among shoppers (aged > 18 years, grocery shopped online with obesity [body mass index, 30 kg/m
resultsThe most common barriers (25%) were money and time, while health motivated most food purchases (55%). Four themes emerged from interviews: (1) consuming healthy foods was hard, (2) healthy meal planning would be easier with a one-stop shopping tool, (3) the application addressed shoppers' needs, and (4) some additions could promote application sustainability. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Smart Cart 2.0 addressed healthy eating barriers. Integrating feedback will enhance application design for future evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.