Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40946113›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2026

Biased Agonism at β-Adrenoceptor Subtypes: A Drug Development Perspective.

Martin C Michel, Ongun Onaran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin C MichelDepartment of Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. marmiche@uni-mainz.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-8467
Ongun OnaranDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selectivity of a drug for a desired response as compared to undesirable responses (side effect) is a key goal of drug development. Early concepts to achieve such selectivity were based on selectivity for a molecular target as compared to others, pharmacokinetic factors to achieve high concentrations in the target tissue as compared to low concentrations in others, differential efficacy in the target vs. others tissues, and leveraging the concept of cell type and tissue differences in expression levels of receptors and their related signaling molecules, which can be further complicated by alterations of such ratios in disease. Biased agonism occurs when one response is activated preferentially over another after accounting for the above other factors. Thus, assessment of ligand bias is not always easy. β-Adrenoceptors have played a relevant role in our understanding of the phenomenon of biased agonism. Several clinically used β-adrenoceptor ligands were proposed to exhibit biased agonism, but the findings often are inconclusive, at least partly based on the overall complexity of assessment of biased signaling. These complexities also make it challenging to determine the desired biased profile of a ligand at the start of a drug research and development project, particularly for innovative applications. Thus, biased agonism has potential to contribute to functional target selectivity, but its prospective use remains challenging.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsDrug DevelopmentReceptors, Adrenergic, betaAnimalsHumansLigandsSignal TransductionAdrenergic beta-AgonistsLigandsReceptors, Adrenergic, betaBiased agonismDrug developmentβ1-adrenoceptorβ2-adrenoceptorβ3-adrenoceptor

Identifiers

PMID40946113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.