ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2025
International application of an optimized harmonization approach for longitudinal cognitive data in people with HIV.
Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe previously developed a refined longitudinal data harmonization method to address the challenge of nonoverlapping cognitive tests across cohorts, successfully harmonizing data from 5 large-scale US HIV studies. Building on this harmonized data set, we now aim to apply this method to an additional US HIV study and cognitive data from HIV studies in China, India, and Uganda. This effort will result in a more comprehensive data set with a larger, internationally diverse sample that includes both people with HIV and people without HIV. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingThe new cohorts to be harmonized included cognitive tests that did not fully overlap across studies, a challenge for traditional harmonization methods. We applied our refined approach, designed for scenarios without direct test linkage. In the Uganda cohort, where a key method assumption was violated, we implemented targeted adjustments.
resultsThe harmonized cognitive domain scores were consistent across cohorts and strongly correlated with raw or log-transformed cognitive test data (eg, timed outcomes). These scores preserved key patterns of variation observed in the raw data for key demographics-such as age, education, and race-and maintained age-related longitudinal trajectories of cognitive performance derived from all participants' visits.
conclusionThe resulting harmonized data set includes 18,270 participants across multiple countries, significantly enhancing its diversity and utility. It lays the groundwork for developing normative data and conducting more robust analyses to address critical neuro-HIV research questions. This study also demonstrates the adaptability of the refined harmonization method in integrating new data and accommodating methodological challenges. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: People with HIV (PWH) often face a variety of cognitive challenges, but these issues can look different for each person. As different studies use different tests to measure cognitive abilities, it is difficult to combine the results from multiple studies and draw clear conclusions. In our previous work, we developed a refined method to harmonize data from 5 large US-based HIV neuro studies. Such method could handle the scenarios where nonoverlapping cognitive tests are used in certain domains across different studies. We now aim to include additional cohorts from the United States, China, India, and Uganda. Because these new cohorts also use nonoverlapping cognitive tests in certain domains, we applied our developed approach to harmonize the new data into our previously harmonized data. Our refined method created "harmonized scores" for cognitive abilities that closely matched the original test results. These scores captured differences related to age, education, and other factors while preserving how each person's cognitive abilities changed over time. By using this method to combine new data with existing data, we were able to create a more comprehensive and diverse data set. This will aid researchers to better understand the wide range of cognitive changes in PWH, leading to stronger, more inclusive studies on the impact of HIV on cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.