Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40945523›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2025

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial.

Quisette P Janssen, Jacob L van Dam, Marlies L van Bekkum, Bert A Bonsing, Hendrik Bos, Koop P Bosscha, Stefan A W Bouwense, Lieke Brouwer-Hol, Anna M E Bruynzeel, Olivier R Busch and 30 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dual-energy CT extracellular volume fraction for predicting the chemotherapeutic response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Quisette P JanssenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jacob L van DamDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marlies L van BekkumDepartment of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hendrik BosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, Netherlands.
Koop P BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands.
Stefan A W BouwenseDepartment of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Lieke Brouwer-HolDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anna M E BruynzeelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter-Paul L O CoeneDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Casper H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jan Willem B de GrootDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Brigitte C M HaberkornDepartment of Medical Oncology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Tom M KarstenDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Geert KazemierDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marion B van der KolkDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Mike S L LiemDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Olaf J L LoosveldDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
Saskia A C LuelmoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Misha D P LuyerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Leonie J M MekenkampDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Vincent B NieuwenhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Joost J M E NuyttensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Gijs A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Martijn W J StommelDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Eva VersteijneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Judith de Vos-GeelenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Roeland F de WildeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Babs M ZonderhuisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bronno van der HoltDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marjolein Y V HomsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Johanna W WilminkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: b.grootkoerkamp@erasmusmc.nl.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PREOPANC-2 trial aimed to evaluate whether neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX improved overall survival compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant gemcitabine in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methodsIn this investigator-initiated, open-label, nationwide, phase 3 randomised trial, patients aged 18 years or older with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC and a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled across 19 Dutch centres. Patients in the FOLFIRINOX (FFX) group received FOLFIRINOX (85 mg/m

findingsFrom June 5, 2018, to Jan 28, 2021, 375 patients were randomly assigned to the FFX group (n=188) or the CRT group (n=187). Six patients (three per group) were excluded due to ineligibility (n=4) or immediate withdrawal of informed consent after randomisation (n=2). 208 (56%) of 369 patients were male and 161 (44%) were female. After a median follow-up of 42·3 months (IQR 35·7-48·7), median overall survival was 21·9 months (95% CI 17·7-27·0) in the FFX group versus 21·3 months (16·8-25·5) in the CRT group (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·69-1·13], p=0·32). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (43 [25%] of 175 in the FFX group vs 38 [22%] of 176 in the CRT group), diarrhoea (41 [23%] vs two [1%]), and leukopenia (14 [8%] vs 26 [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 85 (49%) patients in the FFX group compared with 75 (43%) in the CRT group (p=0·26). Adverse events of grades 3 or worse occurred in 117 (67%) patients in the FFX group versus 106 (60%) patients in the CRT group (p=0·20). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (1%) patients in the FFX group (multi-organ failure and intestinal mucositis) and one (1%) patient in the CRT group (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage).

interpretationThis randomised trial did not show a difference in overall survival between neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. Both neoadjuvant treatment regimens may be considered in these patients.

fundingDutch Cancer Society and ZonMw.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChemoradiotherapyDeoxycytidineNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedDeoxycytidineFluorouracilfolfirinoxGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.