ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Functional evidence for early origin of tactile acuity in the vertebrate somatosensory system.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral mechanisms of tactile sensation in fish.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Evolution of sensory organs: Lessons from walking fish.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Velocity sensitivity of mechanotransduction in the afferent terminal underlies vibration detection in the Pacinian corpuscle.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mammals and reptiles possess a sophisticated somatosensory system for precise tactile discrimination via mechanosensory end-organs, such as Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles and others. These structures detect sustained pressure, velocity, and vibrations, thereby facilitating nuanced environmental interactions. It is not known whether the ancestral anamniotic somatosensory system, typically lacking such structures, provides comparable tactile discrimination. Here, we investigate the Schnauzenorgan, a specialized foraging chin appendage in the mormyrid fish, Gnathonemus petersii, and show that it detects touch via functionally distinct myelinated mechanosensory afferents. Although these afferents terminate in the skin as seemingly free nerve endings, they detect sustained pressure, transient touch, velocity, and low- and high-frequency vibrations. Thus, despite lacking typical end-organs, the Schnauzenorgan enables tactile discrimination rivaling that of amniotic extremities. Our findings reveal a previously unrecognized functional complexity in the ancestral piscine somatosensory system, suggesting that the nuanced mechanosensory capacity of amniotes was inherited from anamniote predecessors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.