Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40945466›Full record

ArticleESMO open2025

Assessing targetable NTRK1/2/3 fusions in mesenchymal tumors via whole-exome RNA sequencing.

H Vanacker, M Brahmi, D Pissaloux, A Meurgey, M Karanian, X Feng, F Le Loarer, I Ray-Coquard, W Waissi, S Paindavoine and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

H VanackerUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France. Electronic address: helene.vanacker@lyon.unicancer.fr.
M BrahmiUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
D PissalouxUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
A MeurgeyUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
M KaranianUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
X FengCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
F Le LoarerFrench Sarcoma Group, France; Institut Bergonié, Department of Pathology, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Université de Bordeaux, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
I Ray-CoquardUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
W WaissiUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
S PaindavoineUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France.
A HoulierUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France.
N CorradiniUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; French Sarcoma Group, France; Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France.
J-Y BlayUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
F TirodeUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052 - CNRS UMR5286, Lyon France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; French Sarcoma Group, France.
A DufresneUnicancer Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon France; French Sarcoma Group, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) 1/2/3 fusions, though rare, are highly sought in cancer diagnostics due to tyrosine kinase inhibitors' histology-agnostic approval based on significant efficacy across tumor types. In mesenchymal tumors, these fusions are identified in five typical NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumors (NMT): infantile fibrosarcomas, lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors, NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms, and minority subsets of ALK-negative inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors and quadruple wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors. However, their occurrence in other subtypes and actionability remain uncertain.

methodsThis retrospective study included adult and pediatric patients with mesenchymal FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) tumor samples collected between January 2016 and March 2023. Eligible samples underwent whole-exome RNA sequencing (WERS) for mesenchymal tumor diagnosis or theranostic assessment. Results were reviewed by a multidisciplinary molecular board to assess technical, biological, and clinical relevance.

resultsAmong 3015 samples, primarily malignant, intermediate, and benign mesenchymal tumors, 111 (3.68%) harbored at least one bioinformatically detected NTRK fusion. Forty-three were biologically irrelevant due to absent kinase domains (group 1), and 11 were technical false positives (group 2). Of the 57 robustly identified cases (1.8%), 54 were typical NMT subtypes with canonical gene partners (group 3). Group 4 included three rare fusions in genetically complex sarcomas: MDM2/CDK4-amplified liposarcoma, MDM2/CDK4-amplified intimal sarcoma, and uterine leiomyosarcoma. These cases featured novel fusion partners, higher fusion counts, and comparable single nucleotide variants (SNVs) to group 3.

conclusionWERS reliably identifies actionable NTRK fusions, predominantly in five NMT subtypes, whereas NTRK fusions were rare and extremely rare in other sarcomas where their targetability remains unclear. Routine NTRK screening should prioritize tumors suspected of being NMT rather than being broadly applied.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkBReceptor, trkCAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGene FusionHumansMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedMembrane GlycoproteinsNTRK1 protein, humanNTRK3 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkBReceptor, trkCtropomyosin-related kinase-B, humanmesenchymal tumorsNTRK fusionsNTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumorsNTRK tyrosine kinase inhibitorsRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40945466
PMCPMC12529300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.