ArticleJournal of environmental management2025
Prediction and optimization of electrochemical oxidation efficiency using machine learning: Insights from carbon-based anodes for water treatment.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrochemical oxidation (EO) has emerged as a promising and environmentally sustainable strategy for the treatment of contaminated water, enabling the degradation of refractory pollutants through the in-situ generation of reactive oxidative species. Carbon-based anodes-such as graphite plates, carbon felt, and carbon fibers-are increasingly adopted in EO systems due to their cost-effectiveness, electrochemical stability, and environmental compatibility. However, despite their widespread application, a systematic understanding based on data-driven modeling of how different types of unmodified carbon-based anodes influence pollutant removal under varying operational conditions remains lacking. In this study, we applied nine machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the effects of both material and operational parameters on EO performance using carbon-based anodes. A comprehensive dataset of over 1400 experimental entries was analyzed, encompassing variables such as anode type, current density, pH, electrolyte concentration, pollutant characteristics, and reaction time. Among all models tested, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.