Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944936›Full record

ReviewPediatric neurosurgery2026

Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: The Noninvasive Presurgical Evaluation.

Deepankar Mohanty, Michael Quach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepankar MohantyDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA, deepankar.mohanty@bcm.edu.
Michael QuachDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-resistant epilepsy is a debilitating condition that afflicts individuals across all demographics, including children. The only recourse for many of these individuals is neurosurgery to reduce seizure burden, by either resecting or ablating the cerebral source or modulating it with a stimulator device. In either case, a thorough presurgical evaluation is required to identify brain regions of interest and construct an appropriate surgical plan. The scope of this evaluation has grown rapidly over the years as new and refined techniques have emerged. The aim of this article was to condense the most salient points regarding investigational tools used commonly in this process and provide a framework from which epilepsy management providers can tailor their own epilepsy surgery pathway. SUMMARY: This article will discuss criteria to identify appropriate candidates for epilepsy surgery, as well as various techniques that are used to localize seizure onset, interictally active areas, dysfunctional regions, and eloquent cortex. Topics reviewed include neuroimaging (MRI, PET, SPECT), electrophysiology (EEG and MEG), and functional mapping procedures (fMRI, TMS, neuropsychologic evaluation, intracarotid amobarbital test). KEY MESSAGES: A comprehensive, multimodal presurgical evaluation including imaging, electrophysiology, and functional mapping is essential to establish the bounds of the epileptogenic zone in relation to eloquent cortex.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyNeurosurgical ProceduresPreoperative CareBrain MappingChildElectroencephalographyHumansNeuroimagingDrug-resistant epilepsyEpilepsy surgeryFunctional mappingNeuroimagingNeurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID40944936
PMCPMC13218701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.