ArticleEndocrine2025
Revisiting mortality in acromegaly using machine learning.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate predictors of mortality in acromegaly using machine learning (ML) models.
methodsWe analyzed 607 patients with acromegaly. A grid search was applied to compare five types of prediction models in 1,200 configurations. Each model predicted mortality based on 40 disease characteristics, assessed using the Matthews’ correlation coefficient (MCC) and the area under the curve (AUC) metrics. To ensure robust and reliable predictions, we constructed a virtual ensemble model by generating 100 Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) variants and evaluating their performance across 50 random train–test splits.
resultsThe single EBM model fitted to all data achieved an MCC of 0.88 and an AUC of 0.99. Feature importance analysis identified hypertension, first-line transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), disease duration, baseline insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, hypopituitarism, and repeat TSS as key predictors of mortality. A virtual ensemble prediction model showed good generalization performance, with an MCC of 0.64 ± 0.08 and an AUC of 0.96 ± 0.015 across 50 random data splits. 58% of the cohort were female, and 66.9% had macroadenomas. The first-line treatment was TSS in 83.2% of cases. Additional treatments were repeat TSS (16.6%), somatostatin analogs (57%), cabergoline (35.6%), pegvisomant (10.9%), and radiotherapy (16.6%), achieving a 77.8% overall success rate. Hypertension (37.2%) and diabetes (36.4%) were the most common comorbidities. The mortality rate was 8.4%, mainly from cardiovascular disease (41.2%) and cancer (21.6%).
conclusionML demonstrated strong performance in classifying survival status and identifying mortality predictors in acromegaly. The ensemble model provides a reliable and interpretable tool, balancing accuracy with the robustness required for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.