Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944885›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2025

Revisiting mortality in acromegaly using machine learning.

Cem Sulu, Gonenc Onay, Guldaran Bakhdiyarli, Serdar Sahin, Emre Durcan, Zehra Kara, Ahmet Numan Demir, Ozgur Martin, Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Necmettin Tanriover and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cem SuluDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gonenc OnayFaculty of Art and Science, Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Guldaran BakhdiyarliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serdar SahinDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emre DurcanDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zehra KaraDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Numan DemirDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur MartinFaculty of Art and Science, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hande Mefkure OzkayaDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Necmettin TanrioverPituitary Center, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nil ComunogluDepartment of Medical Pathology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Osman KizilkilicDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nurperi GaziogluPituitary Center, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pinar KadiogluDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. kadioglup@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8329-140X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate predictors of mortality in acromegaly using machine learning (ML) models.

methodsWe analyzed 607 patients with acromegaly. A grid search was applied to compare five types of prediction models in 1,200 configurations. Each model predicted mortality based on 40 disease characteristics, assessed using the Matthews’ correlation coefficient (MCC) and the area under the curve (AUC) metrics. To ensure robust and reliable predictions, we constructed a virtual ensemble model by generating 100 Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) variants and evaluating their performance across 50 random train–test splits.

resultsThe single EBM model fitted to all data achieved an MCC of 0.88 and an AUC of 0.99. Feature importance analysis identified hypertension, first-line transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), disease duration, baseline insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, hypopituitarism, and repeat TSS as key predictors of mortality. A virtual ensemble prediction model showed good generalization performance, with an MCC of 0.64 ± 0.08 and an AUC of 0.96 ± 0.015 across 50 random data splits. 58% of the cohort were female, and 66.9% had macroadenomas. The first-line treatment was TSS in 83.2% of cases. Additional treatments were repeat TSS (16.6%), somatostatin analogs (57%), cabergoline (35.6%), pegvisomant (10.9%), and radiotherapy (16.6%), achieving a 77.8% overall success rate. Hypertension (37.2%) and diabetes (36.4%) were the most common comorbidities. The mortality rate was 8.4%, mainly from cardiovascular disease (41.2%) and cancer (21.6%).

conclusionML demonstrated strong performance in classifying survival status and identifying mortality predictors in acromegaly. The ensemble model provides a reliable and interpretable tool, balancing accuracy with the robustness required for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AcromegalyMachine LearningAdultAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsAcromegalyHypertensionMachine learningMortalityTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.