Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944878›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026

Upright 0.5 T open MR defaecating proctography proof of concept study: the inter- and intra-rater variability of pelvic floor measures using seated proctography.

Rashed Sobhan, Paul M Glover, Penny A Gowland, Rahul Munyal, Olivier E Mougin, Christopher G D Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rashed SobhanSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. rashed.sobhan@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-2744
Paul M GloverSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Penny A GowlandSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Rahul MunyalDepartment of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Olivier E MouginSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Christopher G D ClarkeDepartment of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V025856/1Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust 47/185334/CPKILV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe tested the feasibility, data quality, and reliability of an upright magnetic resonance defaecating proctography (uMRDP) technique using an Open 0.5 T ASG MRI scanner. MATERIALS AND

methodsEight healthy volunteers (2 males) performed seated defaecation on a purpose-built radio-frequency commode coil in an Open scanner. An optimised T2-weighted HASTE sequence captured dynamic changes during all three phases of the Kegel manoeuvre. Inter- and intra-rater variability was measured from the pelvic floor (PF) metrices (M-line, H-line, distances of landmarks) extracted by two radiologists.

resultsAll relevant PF landmarks could be identified and metrices were extracted with acceptable inter- and intra-rater variability. Intra-rater variation was marginal, with relative absolute differences ranging from 5 to 21% and 3.2-44%. Inter-rater variability was reported using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Correlation between raters was satisfactory, with r DISCUSSION: The proposed uMRDP technique can be used as a feasible and reliable alternative to supine MRDP, without the necessity of gadolinium injection and bowel preparation. It can capture defaecation in a regular seated posture and can provide information complementary to standard-of-care fluoroscopic proctography for clinicians.

Indexed as

DefecationDefecographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvic FloorAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleObserver VariationProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsSitting PositionYoung AdultOpen magnetPelvic floor imagingRepeatabilityReproducibilityUpright proctography

Identifiers

PMID40944878
PMCPMC12901193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.