ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Standardized reporting of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardized reporting of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma, a primary epithelial malignancy originating in the biliary tree, can be classified based on anatomical location into intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is the more common of the two. CT and MRI play a central role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of eCCA, yet radiological reporting of eCCA often lacks uniformity and completeness which can hamper optimal treatment decision-making. Standardized reporting including standardized terminology and structured reports can address these shortcomings. Standardization produces clear, concise, and accurate terminology to facilitate communication between radiologists, surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and interventionalists, which can be particularly important in complex cases where treatment hinges on discerning fine anatomical details. Structured report templates organize reporting elements in ordered sections to ensure consistency and completeness when conveying relevant imaging findings. In this manuscript, we aim to provide guidance on eCCA reporting, discussing the relevance of each proposed reporting element and presenting a recommended and structured eCCA reporting template. The proposed structured report, adapted from the template proposed by the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, is tailored particularly to North American clinical practice and addresses additional reporting elements such as background liver information and radial dimension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.