ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Annotation-efficient deep learning detection and measurement of mediastinal lymph nodes in CT.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManual detection and measurement of structures in volumetric scans is routine in clinical practice but is time-consuming and subject to observer variability. Automatic deep learning-based solutions are effective but require a large dataset of manual annotations by experts. We present a novel annotation-efficient semi-supervised deep learning method for automatic detection, segmentation, and measurement of the short axis length (SAL) of mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs) in contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) scans.
methodsOur semi-supervised method combines the precision of expert annotations with the quantity advantages of pseudolabeled data. It uses an ensemble of 3D nnU-Net models trained on a few expert-annotated scans to generate pseudolabels on a large dataset of unannotated scans. The pseudolabels are then filtered to remove false positive LNs by excluding LNs outside the mediastinum and LNs overlapping with other anatomical structures. Finally, a single 3D nnU-Net model is trained using the filtered pseudo-labels. Our method optimizes the ratio of annotated/non-annotated dataset sizes to achieve the desired performance, thus reducing manual annotation effort.
resultsExperimental studies on three chest ceCT datasets with a total of 268 annotated scans (1817 LNs), of which 134 scans were used for testing and the remaining for ensemble training in batches of 17, 34, 67, and 134 scans, as well as 710 unannotated scans, show that the semi-supervised models' recall improvements were 11-24% (0.72-0.87) while maintaining comparable precision levels. The best model achieved mean SAL differences of 1.65 ± 0.92 mm for normal LNs and 4.25 ± 4.98 mm for enlarged LNs, both within the observer variability.
conclusionOur semi-supervised method requires one-fourth to one-eighth less annotations to achieve a performance to supervised models trained on the same dataset for the automatic measurement of mediastinal LNs in chest ceCT. Using pseudolabels with anatomical filtering may be effective to overcome the challenges of the development of AI-based solutions in radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.