Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944801›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Improving Perinatal Palliative Care in the Communities: A Regional Population-Based Study.

Kohei Takashima, Masahito Hitosugi, Masahito Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Maruo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Japanese Version of the Quality of Dying and Death in the PICU Instrument: Development and Validation in Eight Centers in Japan.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kohei TakashimaDepartment of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa, Seta, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Masahito HitosugiDepartment of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa, Seta, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan. hitosugi@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5243-8766
Masahito YamamotoDepartment of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa, Seta, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Yoshihiro MaruoDepartment of Pediatrics, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerinatal palliative care, defined as support for creating birth plans that include treatment and care decisions, is crucial for families facing life-threatening fetal conditions. However, the variability in medical resources across communities necessitates the development of tailored, community-based perinatal palliative care systems that support shared decision-making through multidisciplinary care. This study uses child death review (CDR) data to examine the current status and challenges of perinatal palliative care delivery in regional communities, focusing on decision-making processes, care planning, and transition to home care. It also compares cases in which families selected comfort care with those choosing intensive care to explore differences in care processes and outcomes.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using regional CDR data from children under 18 years who died in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, between 2018 and 2020. Data on children eligible for perinatal palliative care were primarily collected from perinatal centers and perinatal cooperative hospitals participating in the CDR.

resultsAmong 131 deaths, 19 involved life-threatening conditions considered for perinatal palliative care. Two lacked prenatal diagnoses, while 17 discussed care plans, including medical intervention options, and mode of delivery. Of these, 65% (11/17) chose comfort care, while 35% (6/17) opted for intensive care. A comparison between these groups showed that the comfort care group had a longer decision-making period (median, 29 vs. 9 days; p = 0.044). Decision support before birth, which included accurate information about fetal conditions, care planning options, and psychological support, was not provided by clinical psychologists or palliative care specialists. Of the 17, four patients were discharged home, and one died at home. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study highlights the challenges of implementing perinatal palliative care in communities. The prolonged decision-making process associated with comfort care may reflect the significant psychological burden on families. Factors such as care plans influence family burden, emphasizing the need for individualized support. The absence of specialized support and low rates of transition to home care for end-of-life care are critical issue for improvement in community-based perinatal palliative care.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePerinatal CareAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJapanMalePregnancyQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesBirth plansChild death reviewLife-threatening conditionPerinatal palliative careRetrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID40944801
PMCPMC12484261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.