ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
The relative importance of key life domains for people with disability: findings from a cross-sectional survey of NDIS participants in Australia.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric evaluation of the Disability Wellbeing Index (DWI) against the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) among people with disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the relative importance for people with disability of key life domains and whether this differs between young people (15-24) and adults (25 and over).
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from 20 October to 31 December 2022 with National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) participants asked to rank eight domains: Choice & control, Daily living, Relationships, Home, Health & wellbeing, Lifelong learning, Work, Social, Community and Civic participation. Based on a random utility framework, the data were analysed based on a ranked-ordered logit model to estimate preference shares for the order of preferences across domains. Analyses were conducted separately for the young and adult cohorts. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by relaxing the equal importance of NDIS domains in the ranking exercise based on related life domain importance rating information, which was also collected in the survey.
resultsOur sample consisted of 1140 NDIS participants. While the majority ranked the domains as equally important, answers from the rating module suggested otherwise. Adjustments for these differences lead to similar results with both age cohorts ranking Health & Wellbeing, Home and Daily living as the most important domains. These were followed by Relationships, Choice & control, Social, Community & Civic participation, Lifelong learning, and Work for younger people. For older people the importance order between the Choice & control and Relationships was switched.
conclusionOur results revealed similarity between what younger and older people perceive as important and despite often receiving a fair share of policy attention, work was seen, on average, as the least important life domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.