ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025
Olfactory Imprinting to Amino Acids is Unpredictable but Specific.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfactory imprinting is evident when animals respond differently to olfactory cues later in life as a result of experiencing those cues during a sensitive window that occurs early in development. The cues can consist of single chemicals or complex mixtures. Responses to mixtures are complicated, as mixtures can contain odorants that evoke dissimilar responses in unimprinted adults. For example, salmon appear to imprint to amino acid mixtures, yet individual amino acids can evoke attraction, avoidance, or indifference. We aimed to dissect how odorants that evoke dissimilar behavioral responses contribute to mixture imprinting. For this, zebrafish were developmentally exposed to L-leucine, L-lysine and L-valine, or β-phenylethyl alcohol (control), grown to adulthood, and then their preference responses to the same chemicals were measured. Imprinting was apparent to β-phenylethyl alcohol, L-leucine, and L-lysine, but not to L-valine. The responses to L-leucine, and L-lysine were opposing as they evoked attraction and avoidance, respectively. As adults, fish imprinted to a mixture of L-leucine, and L-lysine only responded to the same mixture, not its constituents. This supports the contention that an imprinting cue behaves as a unique object, regardless of its complexity. However, the imprinting response to the mixture was biased by the aversive amino acid, which indicates the imprintable constituents can have different weights. For species that use amino acid profiles to guide their migration, it appears the contributions that any given amino acid makes to the mixture may be quite important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.