Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944782›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2025

Exploring Ciliary Mechanisms in the Causation of Hydrocephalus in Humans-Similarities and Differences from Animal Models.

Tina Nørgaard Munch, Paula L Hedley, Kim Gjerum Nielsen, Michael Christiansen, Nathalie Jurisch-Yaksi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exome sequencing-based identification ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina Nørgaard MunchDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. tina.noergaard.munch@regionh.dk.
Paula L HedleyDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim Gjerum NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael ChristiansenDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nathalie Jurisch-YaksiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine (IKOM), Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. nathalie.jurisch-yaksi@ntnu.no.

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond grant no: 1030-00239BNorges Forskningsråd grant no: 314189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrocephalus is a condition defined by excessive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) relative to the brain volume. Congenital and infantile forms of hydrocephalus are both genetically and physiologically heterogenous. Among the candidate genes implicated in hydrocephalus, many are associated with cilia, a subcellular structure involved in CSF circulation and neurodevelopment. First, we provide an overview of 129 genes associated with human hydrocephalus and currently reported in the literature, categorized according to their possible involvement in ciliary structure, ciliary function, or cilia-mediated processes/signalling pathways. Intriguingly, there are large differences in the prevalence and manifestations of cilia-related hydrocephalus in humans as compared to rodents. Second, we address these differences by revisiting human and animal studies to outline potential cilia-related mechanisms and molecular signalling pathways contributing to hydrocephalus. We propose that our rapidly expanding understanding of cilia's role in CSF circulation and brain development will support a more precise characterization of hydrocephalus subtypes, ultimately guiding the development of more personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

CiliaHydrocephalusAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansSignal TransductionCiliaEpendymaHedgehogHydrocephalusNeurodevelopmentNotchPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaWntZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.