Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944771›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Plastic pollution in the Amazon: The first comprehensive and structured scoping review.

Jéssica Fernandes de Melo, Daniel Tregidgo, Anamelia Jesus, Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jéssica Fernandes de MeloLeônidas and Maria Deane Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rua Teresina, 476. Adrianópolis, Manaus, AM, 69057-070, Brazil. jessicafmelo@live.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-0834
Daniel TregidgoMamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development, Estrada do Bexiga, 2584, Fonte Boa, Tefé, AM, 69553-225, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-831X
Anamelia JesusMamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development, Estrada do Bexiga, 2584, Fonte Boa, Tefé, AM, 69553-225, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-6707
Jesem Douglas Yamall OrellanaLeônidas and Maria Deane Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rua Teresina, 476. Adrianópolis, Manaus, AM, 69057-070, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-2615

Funding

PROEP-LABS/ILMD/FIOCRUZ AMAZÔNIA (2023-2025)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic pollution is a global One Health crisis, yet research has focused largely on marine environments. The Amazon-the world's largest drainage basin and second most plastic-polluted river-has received limited scientific attention. This scoping review is the first to apply a systematic protocol (PRISMA-ScR) to assess plastic contamination across Amazonian ecosystems. We reviewed 52 peer-reviewed studies reporting plastic litter and fragments in terrestrial and aquatic environments of the biome. Most evidence concerns microplastics in Brazilian sites along the main Amazon River, with a focus on fish. However, plastics were also found in sediments, plants, and diverse fauna including birds, reptiles, and mammals. No studies reported nanoplastics. The contamination of key food and water sources poses a major One Health risk for traditional populations. We identify urgent research gaps-especially in non-fish fauna, tributaries, and other Amazonian countries-and highlight the need for targeted mitigation through waste management and education.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionPlasticsRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBrazilEcosystemPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAmazon basinFood securityOne healthPlastic waste

Identifiers

PMID40944771
PMCPMC12779817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.