Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944760›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

Comparative analysis of surgical and endovascular aneurysm repair in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center study with 1,171 patients.

Per Kristian Eide, Wilhelm Sorteberg, Are H Pripp, Pål A Rønning, Angelika G Sorteberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Per Kristian EideDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. p.k.eide@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-9280
Wilhelm SortebergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Are H PrippKG Jebsen Centre for Brain Fluid Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-7309
Pål A RønningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-7415
Angelika G SortebergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-3696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare surgical and endovascular therapy (EVT) approaches to aneurysm repair in all aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients treated within our institution over a 12-year period from 2011 to 2022.

methodsThe study comprised a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data extracted from a hospital quality registry that we established in 2011, containing comprehensive information about all patients treated for aSAH. We included SAH patients within the institution's catchment area who underwent surgical or endovascular aneurysm repair. Exclusion criteria involved patients from external regions, those treated at other institutions, no aneurysm repair performed, or instances undergoing a combination of surgery and EVT. Pretreatment data encompassed the clinical condition at admission, comorbidity, radiological details, aneurysm characteristics, and duration between the bleed and aneurysm repair. Mortality was primary outcome measure; secondary outcome included modified Rankin Score after approximately six months.

resultsThe study encompassed 1,171 patients (65% women and 35% men) undergoing aneurysm repair from 2011 to 2022. Admission data revealed 31.1% in Hunt-Hess grade 4-5. Surgical repair was performed in 573 (48.9%) patients, and EVT in 598 (51.1%) patients. Pretreatment information was comparable for both groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated lower mortality in the surgical than the EVT group (P = 0.023; Log-rank test) over the 12-year period. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year mortality rates were 12.4%, 19.5%, and 27.7% for the surgery group, and 18.7%, 25.2%, and 31.7% for the EVT group, respectively. Modified Rankin Score was worse for EVT. There was lower mortality in surgical than EVT groups in patients treated for anterior communicating artery (ACOM, n = 420) and posterior communicating artery (PCOM, n = 177) aneurysms. Shorter time to aneurysm repair and more extensive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage characterized the surgery group.

conclusionsMortality was lower in surgical patients. Plausible explanations are the maintenance of surgical skills and prompt reduction of intracranial pressure.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmNeurosurgical ProceduresSubarachnoid HemorrhageAdultAgedEndovascular Aneurysm RepairFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageEndovascular treatmentModified rankin scoreMortalityOutcomeSurgical clipping

Identifiers

PMID40944760
PMCPMC12433440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.