Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944747›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

Predictors of shunt response in iNPH: differentiating responders, early and late non-responders, and the role of valve adjustments.

Santhosh G Thavarajasingam, Mahmoud El-Khatib, Stefania Roxana Kalb, Ahmed Salih, Daniele S C Ramsay, Ahkash Thavarajasingam, Dragan Jankovic, Malte Ottenhausen, Darius Kalasauskas, Andreas Kramer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Santhosh G Thavarajasingam *Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. santhoshgthava@outlook.com.
Mahmoud El-Khatib *Imperial Brain and Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stefania Roxana KalbDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ahmed SalihImperial Brain and Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Daniele S C RamsayImperial Brain and Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ahkash ThavarajasingamImperial Brain and Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dragan JankovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Malte OttenhausenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Darius KalasauskasDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Angelika GutenbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is diagnosed based on a positive shunt response. However, up to 40% of patients who undergo ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting fail to exhibit sustained improvement. The management of iNPH remains challenging, particularly for non-responders who deteriorate despite surgery. We aimed to determine what features differentiate between long term versus short term responders and do valve adjustments affect their outcome? MATERIAL AND

methodsWe included patients that underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for iNPH between December 2006 and December 2016. Patients were stratified as early (< 6 months) and late (> 6 months) non-responders, and responders. Descriptive statistics, time series plotting, chi-squared tests, and ANOVA analyses were used.

resultsOur cohort of 65 iNPH patients exhibited a mean follow-up of 3.75 years and consisted of 53.8% early non-responders, 15.4% late non-responders, and 30.8% responders. Comorbidities were distributed across all groups but did not significantly differentiate between response categories. A considerable subset experienced symptom deterioration after the six months mark. Shunt valve adjustments were more frequent in non-responders but did not prevent continued deterioration. In late non-responders, valve adjustments merely slowed symptom progression, without halting deterioration.

conclusionOur study underscores that valve pressure adjustments in early non-responders, who likely never benefit from shunt surgery, are not effective, and highlights the emergence of a late non-responder phenotype, where symptom deterioration becomes evident 6 months post-shunting. Our findings outline the need to explore alternative treatment strategies for managing symptoms in iNPH non-responders, as well as prolonged follow-up regimens to monitor late non-responders.

Indexed as

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureVentriculoperitoneal ShuntAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeNon-respondersNPHShunt-adjustmentShunt-response

Identifiers

PMID40944747
PMCPMC12433436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.