ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
An overview on the management of ankle fractures in elderly patients aged 65 and over: a scoping review.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Full weight-bearing after geriatric ankle fractures-No problem?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Effect of esketamine on postoperative pain relief and depressive status in patients with traumatic fractures.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnkle fractures are increasingly common in the elderly and present unique challenges due to osteoporosis, comorbidities, and frailty. Management remains controversial, with surgical fixation generally favored, though the optimal approach is debated. This scoping review aimed to map current evidence on the management of ankle fractures in patients aged 65 and over, highlighting treatment strategies, outcomes, and gaps in knowledge.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 2010 to 2024. Eligible studies reporting treatment outcomes in elderly patients were included. Data were charted and summarized narratively; pooled descriptive analyses were presented to illustrate trends, consistent with PRISMA-ScR methodology.
resultsA total of 4783 articles were identified, of which 32 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 32 studies analyzed, 24 were conducted in Europe, 5 in the United States, and 1 each in China, Korea, and New Zealand. Study designs comprised 27 retrospective observational studies, 3 randomized controlled trials, one prospective case series and one ambispective cohort study. Open reduction and internal fixation remain the standard surgical method, while alternatives such as tibiotalocalcaneal nailing and fibular intramedullary nailing are increasingly reported. Overall functional recovery was satisfactory, but outcomes varied by comorbidity burden, fracture pattern, and rehabilitation strategy. Complication rates were substantial, with wound problems, fixation failure, and infections most frequent. Mortality ranged from 10 to 27%, with higher rates in nonoperative and frail populations. Evidence on weight-bearing protocols and long-term outcomes remains inconsistent.
conclusionsCurrent evidence supports surgery as the preferred option for most elderly ankle fractures, though individualized, multidisciplinary care is essential. Research gaps include standardized fixation protocols, comorbidity-adjusted pathways, and long-term functional outcomes. High-quality prospective studies are needed to refine clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.