ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Facial Muscle Chain Concept in Forehead Line Treatment.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current treatment of horizontal forehead lines typically involves botulinum toxin injections targeting the frontalis muscle, though this approach may occasionally result in complications such as eyebrow ptosis. This letter introduces the facial muscle chain concept, which describes the three-dimensional anatomical relationships between facial muscles that may influence dynamic wrinkle formation. Unlike conventional muscle pairing descriptions found in existing literature, this framework explores how targeting the corrugator supercilii muscle could potentially affect frontalis muscle activity through interconnected anatomical relationships. Previous anatomical observations from cadaveric dissections demonstrate the corrugator supercilii's positioning relative to the frontalis muscle, with intermingling fibres identified at depths of 3-5 millimetres. Our clinical observations suggest that botulinum toxin injections targeting the corrugator supercilii may produce changes in horizontal forehead lines without direct frontalis muscle treatment. This approach appears to maintain natural facial expression while addressing the aesthetic concern, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with direct frontalis injection. The facial muscle chain concept may have broader applications beyond forehead treatment, as similar interconnected relationships appear to exist between other facial muscle groups. This theoretical framework suggests that facial muscles function as an integrated system rather than isolated units, which could inform individualized injection strategies based on patient-specific anatomical variations. We present these observations to the aesthetic medicine community for consideration and further investigation. Future research utilising advanced imaging techniques and comparative outcome studies would be necessary to fully evaluate the clinical significance of this approach and establish evidence-based treatment protocols for potential integration into aesthetic medicine practice.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.