Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944704›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025

Robotic-Assisted Excision of Intravesical Burch Urethropexy Staples and Mesh.

Courtney K Pfeuti, Brian J Linder

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Courtney K PfeutiDepartment of OB/Gyn, Division of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Brian J LinderDepartment of OB/Gyn, Division of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Linder.Brian@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4674-2598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUse of synthetic mesh material in urogynecology for anti-incontinence surgery risks complications such as vaginal exposure and erosion. Although intravesical erosion is rare, management is complex with limited existing guidance, specifically following retropubic urethral suspension procedures.

methodsThis is a 78-year-old female patient referred for management of intravesical mesh and staples. Prior surgical history included a retropubic urethral suspension and laparoscopic Burch urethropexy with Prolene mesh. Following years of persistent urinary symptoms, cystoscopy identified intravesical mesh. Imaging revealed multiple tacking device staples in the retropubic space. Robotic-assisted excision of the intravesical mesh and staples was performed. After identification of the retropubic Burch mesh and dissection to the bladder, an intentional cystotomy was made. Circumferential dissection along the mesh permitted complete excision. The cystotomy was closed in two layers and reinforced with a urachal flap.

resultsThe patient was discharged on postoperative day one. After two weeks of Foley catheter use, a cystogram showed no extravasation. The patient passed a voiding trial.

conclusionsRobotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh from a retropubic urethropexy is safe and feasible. Complete surgical excision helps achieve a tension-free closure and prevent recurrence. Surgical techniques demonstrated here may be helpful for managing such cases of intravesical mesh.

Indexed as

Device RemovalRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical MeshUrethraUrinary BladderAgedFemaleHumansAnti-incontinenceIntravesical meshMesh erosionRobotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.