ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Robotic-Assisted Excision of Intravesical Burch Urethropexy Staples and Mesh.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global trends and thematic evolution in robotic urogynecologic surgery: a mapping and visualization study (Inception - 2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUse of synthetic mesh material in urogynecology for anti-incontinence surgery risks complications such as vaginal exposure and erosion. Although intravesical erosion is rare, management is complex with limited existing guidance, specifically following retropubic urethral suspension procedures.
methodsThis is a 78-year-old female patient referred for management of intravesical mesh and staples. Prior surgical history included a retropubic urethral suspension and laparoscopic Burch urethropexy with Prolene mesh. Following years of persistent urinary symptoms, cystoscopy identified intravesical mesh. Imaging revealed multiple tacking device staples in the retropubic space. Robotic-assisted excision of the intravesical mesh and staples was performed. After identification of the retropubic Burch mesh and dissection to the bladder, an intentional cystotomy was made. Circumferential dissection along the mesh permitted complete excision. The cystotomy was closed in two layers and reinforced with a urachal flap.
resultsThe patient was discharged on postoperative day one. After two weeks of Foley catheter use, a cystogram showed no extravasation. The patient passed a voiding trial.
conclusionsRobotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh from a retropubic urethropexy is safe and feasible. Complete surgical excision helps achieve a tension-free closure and prevent recurrence. Surgical techniques demonstrated here may be helpful for managing such cases of intravesical mesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944704What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.