ArticleEpilepsia2026
Quality of life over time after new onset refractory status epilepticus.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to better characterize the long-term neurological quality of life (QOL) outcomes (using the Neuro-QOL scale) in survivors of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and provide guidance for psychological and social support strategies.
methodsUtilizing data from a multicenter prospective study of NORSE/FIRES led by Yale University, we enrolled patients who completed the validated, patient-reported Neuro-QOL scale at least once at 3-6 months (n = 37), 12 months (n = 29), 24 months (n = 23), or ≥36 months (n = 9) following discharge. The Neuro-QOL scale assesses physical, mental, and social health in patients with neurological disorders. QOL impairment (QOL-I) scores were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. T-scores enabled comparisons with reference populations.
resultsIn adults, median QOL-I improved from 44.1% at 3-6 months to 37.6% at 36+ months. Paired analysis showed significant improvement in QOL-I between 3-6 and 24 months (p = .016), with specific improvements in communication, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, and mobility. Greater improvement was also observed for participation in social roles (5.5-point T-score gain) compared to the reference population, suggesting meaningful change. A gradual improvement in overall QOL-I scores was also observed in pediatric participants, despite a modest sample size (n = 5 with data at 3-6 and 12 months). Measures of fatigue and anxiety persisted in adults, and cognitive difficulties persisted in both adults and children. In adults, longer status epilepticus duration and intensive care unit stay were associated with poorer QOL. Additionally, a higher number of antiseizure medications was associated with more depression, cognitive impairments, and perceived stigma. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight the potential for recovery following an acute episode of NORSE, although many patients continue to face challenges requiring ongoing support, and the clinical meaning of the reported QOL improvement remains unclear. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of strategic multidisciplinary support systems in the years following discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.