ReviewChemistryOpen2025
Morphological Modification of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials Using Different Types of Organic Modifiers.
Review in ChemistryOpen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review on the synthesis of β-TCP using different methods for biomedical applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Synergistic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on the Structural and Antibacterial Performance of LLDPE Blown Films.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Morphological Modification of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials Using Different Types of Organic Modifiers.ChemistryOpen · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organic modifiers make incorporating nanoparticles into composite components easier, improving their optical, mechanical, and electrical characteristics. By altering the dimension, arrangement, aggregation, and surface characteristics of the nanoparticles, organic modifiers are thought to be an efficient way to regulate the morphology of nanometal oxides. This can be evaluated by the synthesis and modification of nanometal oxides using various organic agents, such as tiny ligands, various acids, polymers, and so on. Organic modifiers improve crystallinity, bind to oxide surfaces efficiently, and cause morphological changes, reducing agglomeration, raising surface roughness, and exposing more reactive facets according to XRD, FT-IR, BET, SEM, and TEM investigations. In comparison to unmodified oxides, the results showed that organic modifiers greatly decreased agglomeration, regulated particle size distribution, and improved crystallinity. In general, surface modification with organic modifiers is necessary to maximize the effectiveness of nanoparticles for many reasons, such as materials research, drug delivery, diagnosis, and catalytic processes. In this review, we primarily presented several methods for applying organic modifiers to modify the surface of nanocrystals. Here, we mainly focused on the structural modification of six types of metal oxides (TiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.