ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2025
Radiation therapy for amyloid-producing odontogenic tumor in a cat: a case report.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiation therapy for amyloid-producing odontogenic tumor in a cat: a case report.Australian veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyloid-producing odontogenic tumor (APOT) is a rare odontogenic neoplasm in cats, characterized by amyloid deposition within the tumor. Surgical resection is commonly recommended, but in cases where complete excision is difficult, radiation therapy may be considered as an alternative treatment. In this case report, a 10-year-old male neutered domestic cat with an APOT of the maxilla was treated with radiation therapy and showed favorable outcomes. The treatment protocol involved a total dose of 42 Gy (Gray) administered over six sessions, with good tumor control, and minimal side effects observed over a 481-day follow-up period. This case suggests that radiation therapy can be an effective treatment option for APOT, particularly in cases where surgical excision is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.