ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2025
NFATC2::NUTM2A/B Fusions Characterize a Novel Indolent Myoepithelial-Like Neoplasm of the Lungs and Salivary Glands.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary pulmonary NFATC2::NUTM2-associated myoepithelial-like neoplasms: two hi-C-detected cases beyond routine targeted NGS and review of the literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Salivary Gland Carcinoma with DLG1::BRAF Gene Fusion: Report of a Case.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Benign myoepithelioma presenting as fever of unknown origin: a rare clinical manifestation of an uncommon tumor.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- NFATC2::NUTM2A/B Fusions Characterize a Novel Indolent Myoepithelial-Like Neoplasm of the Lungs and Salivary Glands.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing use of next-generation sequencing, the classification of heretofore unclassified neoplasms is evolving rapidly. Specifically, gene fusions have emerged as context-specific defining genetic markers for an increasing number of entities, mostly of soft tissue, bone, and salivary gland origin. We describe four myoepithelial-like neoplasms of salivary (two) and pulmonary (two) origin, carrying recurrent NFATC2 fusions involving NUTM2B (three) and NUTM2A (one) as fusion partners. Patients were two females and two males aged 24-67 years (median, 33). The tumor size ranged from 1 to 4.5 cm. Treatment was surgery without (three) or with (one) adjuvant radiochemotherapy. No metastases or other primary tumors were found at the time of diagnosis. Three patients with follow-up (two with salivary, one with pulmonary tumor) were disease-free at 9, 11, and 31 months. Original diagnoses were "unclassified neoplasm" with consideration of adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma and myoepithelial neoplasm. Histology revealed infiltrating monotonous epithelioid to basaloid cells arranged into lobular aggregates, nests, and cords within variably sclerosed stroma containing extensive basement membrane-like hyaline material. Frankly malignant features (malignant cytology, high mitotic activity, necrosis, perineural or lymphovascular invasion) were absent. IHC showed coexpression of low and high molecular weight keratins (AE1/AE3 and CK5/6; 4/4), EMA (2/2), and CD99 (2/2). Negative markers included p63 (0/4), NUT (0/4), S100 (0/4), SOX10 (0/4), p40 (0/2), and SMA (0/2). This study introduces a novel salivary and lung tumor entity driven by NFATC2::NUTM2A/B fusions and displaying myoepithelial-like morphology but imperfect myoepithelial immunophenotype. Report of more cases should shed light on the biological properties and appropriate therapeutic strategies of this novel neoplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.