Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944338›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Neural Mechanisms of Object Prioritization in Vision.

Damiano Grignolio, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Joy Geng, George Mangun, Clayton Hickey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damiano GrignolioCentre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-2390
Sreenivasan MeyyappanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Joy GengCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
George MangunCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Clayton HickeyCentre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4162-5643

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
European Research Council 804360NIMH NIH HHS MH117991NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991Turing Scheme 2021/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective attention is widely thought to be sensitive to visual objects. This is commonly observed in cueing studies, which show that when attention is deployed to a known target location that happens to fall on a visual object, responses to targets that unexpectedly appear at other locations on that object are faster and more accurate, as if the object in its entirety has been visually prioritized. However, this notion has recently been challenged by results suggesting that putative object-based effects may reflect the influence of hemifield anisotropies in attentional deployment, or of unacknowledged influences of perceptual complexity and visual clutter. Studies employing measures of behavior provide limited opportunity to address these challenges. Here, we used EEG to directly measure the influence of task-irrelevant objects on the deployment of visual attention. We had participants complete a simple visual cueing task involving identification of a target that appeared at either a cued location or elsewhere. Throughout each experimental trial, displays contained task-irrelevant rectangle stimuli that could be oriented horizontally or vertically. We derived two cue-elicited indices of attentional deployment-lateralized alpha oscillations and the ADAN component of the event-related potential-and found that these were sensitive to the otherwise irrelevant orientation of the rectangles. Our results provide evidence that the allocation of visual attention is influenced by objects boundaries, supporting models of object-based attentional prioritization.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmAttentionEvoked PotentialsVisual PerceptionAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultalpha oscillationsattentional prioritizationelectroencephalography (EEG)event‐related potentials (ERPs)object‐based attentionvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID40944338
PMCPMC12432486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.