Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944185›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2025

Can Faecal Eosinophil Cationic Protein and β-Defensin-2 Levels Be Useful in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Infants with Milk-Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis?

Grażyna Czaja-Bulsa, Monika Łokieć, Arleta Drozd

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grażyna Czaja-BulsaChair and Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Nursing, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Monika ŁokiećClinical Department of Paediatrics University Hospital, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland.
Arleta DrozdDepartment of Applied Microbiology and Human Nutrition Physiology, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, ul. Papieża Pawła VI 3, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-2040

Funding

Statutory activities of Pomeranian Medical University WNoZ-319-01/s/12/2020-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of our study was to investigate whether faecal concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (fECP) and human β-defensins (HBD2s) are significantly elevated in children with cow's milk-protein-induced allergic colitis (MPIAP) and whether a monthly milk-free diet reduces these markers. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study involving 70 infants with MPIAP, aged 1-3 months, and 30 healthy controls of the same age. The concentrations of fECP and HBD2 were measured using the ELISA method (IDK

resultsThe concentrations of fECP and HBD2 proved useful in evaluating MPIAP treatment with a milk-free diet, where the resolution of allergy symptoms and a significant (

conclusionsfECP and HBD2 can be used to monitor the resolution of colitis in infants with MPIAP treated with a milk diet, indicating a slower resolution of allergic inflammation than the resolution of allergic symptoms. Therefore, neither of the parameters are useful for the diagnosis of MPIAP.

Indexed as

beta-DefensinsEosinophil Cationic ProteinFecesMilk HypersensitivityMilk ProteinsProctocolitisAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleProspective Studiesbeta-DefensinsBiomarkersDEFB4A protein, humanEosinophil Cationic ProteinMilk Proteinschildrencow’s milk allergyeosinophil cationic proteinfood-protein-induced allergic proctocolitisnon-IgE mediated allergyβ-defensins

Identifiers

PMID40944185
PMCPMC12430058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.