ArticleNutrients2025
Analysis of the Perception of Nutrigenetics in Conventional Nutritional Practice: A Survey-Based Study Applied to Dietitians from Mexico.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNutrigenetics has emerged as a promising tool to advance personalized nutrition strategies. This study aimed to analyze the scope and perception of Mexican dietitians regarding nutritional genomics with an emphasis on nutrigenetics' use in clinical practice.
methodsA survey was conducted online among dietitians in Mexico to assess their educational background, awareness of nutrigenetic testing, use in practice, and interest in further training through 33 questions.
resultsOne hundred and thirty participants from states across six Mexican regions completed the survey, and most of respondents had a bachelor's degree. The analysis showed that while most respondents were familiar with the concepts of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics, 92.3% did not incorporate genetic testing into their practice; the main barriers of their use were misinformation, limited access to reliable resources, and ethical concerns surrounding genetic testing. Although 86.2% expressed interest in learning about nutrigenetics, only 31.5% were willing to invest in further training. Social media and non-academic sources were important sources of information, raising concerns about their inaccurate content and highlighting their importance in completing the curricula. Patients' demand for genetic testing is limited and directed by disease prevention interests.
conclusionsNutrigenetics is currently an area with limited practical application among Mexican dietitians; however, it is perceived as a valuable tool for future daily practice. The gap between perception and application underscores the need to integrate nutrigenetics into undergraduate curricula and to provide accessible, evidence-based professional development; these are essential to promote the ethical and effective use of nutrigenetics and support the transition toward personalized nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.