ReviewNutrients2025
Potential Effects of Low-Calorie Sweeteners on Human Health.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrated network toxicology and experimental validation to investigate potential mechanisms associated with aspartame-induced malignant phenotypic changes in colorectal cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effects of Non-Nutritive Artificial Sweeteners on Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism and Health-Related Outcomes: A Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Selected Nutraceuticals in Metabolic Syndrome: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Non-nutritive sweeteners and body weight in children with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a critical narrative review of current evidence, methodological challenges, biological mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- GC-MS metabolomic profiling and PPARγ-targetedFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) are widely utilized as sugar substitutes due to their intense sweetness, thermal stability, and applicability in weight management and diabetic-friendly products. However, increasing evidence has raised concerns about their potential long-term effects on metabolic health, glucose regulation, cardiovascular function, carcinogenicity, and gut microbiota composition. This review systematically evaluates the pharmacokinetics, metabolic effects, and associated health outcomes of major LCS. Mechanistically, LCS exert effects via sweet taste receptor-mediated pathways, altering glucose absorption, insulin secretion, and intracellular signaling cascades. Additionally, LCS influence gut microbiota composition, with certain agents promoting dysbiosis and glucose intolerance. While some findings support the metabolic benefits of selected LCS, others underscore potential risks, necessitating cautious interpretation. In conclusion, while LCS offer viable alternatives to sugar, their health effects are context-dependent and may vary across different sweeteners and populations. Long-term, high-quality clinical trials are essential to elucidate their safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.