ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Which and How.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clopidogrel vs. aspirin in addition to oral anticoagulation as part of double antithrombotic therapy following PCI: a post-hoc analysis of the PERSEO registry.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC), typically for atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the antiplatelet drugs to be added to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are aspirin and clopidogrel during the initial, short (up to one week) period of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT), and clopidogrel alone during the subsequent 6- to 12-month period of double antithrombotic therapy (DAT). Both direct and indirect data support the recommendation to avoid the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors-ticagrelor and prasugrel-as part of TAT, owing to the increased risk of bleeding. There is less and inconclusive data available regarding the safety and efficacy of DAT when ticagrelor or prasugrel are used instead of clopidogrel. Also, there is very limited evidence for the use of aspirin instead of clopidogrel in a DAT regimen. While acknowledging the safety and effectiveness of the recommended strategies above, it would, nonetheless, be valuable to have alternative options in the choice of antiplatelet agents. In case of very high thrombotic risk, especially when stents are positioned in potentially risky sites (such as the left main or last remaining vessel) a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel may be warranted. Moreover, non-responsiveness to, or pharmacological interactions of, clopidogrel may hamper its efficacy. In this review, we aim at presenting and discussing the evidence supporting the current recommendations for the use of the various antiplatelet agents in AF patients on OAC undergoing PCI, as well as at giving a glimpse at future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.