Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944083›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Elective Umbilical Hernia Repair in Adults in the 21st Century: Challenging the Status Quo.

Sergio Huerta, Jared McAllister, Crystal Phung, Angela A Guzzetta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergio HuertaVA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7720-419X
Jared McAllisterVA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-155X
Crystal PhungVA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.
Angela A GuzzettaVA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On the spectrum of complexity for general surgery operations, umbilical hernia repair (UHR) is on the light side. After inguinal hernias, they are the most commonly repaired hernias and, as such, umbilical hernias are an important component of a general surgery practice. Since the time at which WJ Mayo published his seminal technique on the repair of umbilical hernias, multiple strategies for the management of umbilical hernias have emerged ranging from watchful waiting to open repair, as well as minimally invasive approaches. The present perspective maintains that each approach has its merits depending on the patient, surgeon, and institution. However, randomized controlled trials and clinical practice guidelines have favored some approaches over others. Similarly, recommendations have been developed regarding body mass index classification as well as hernia size for mesh placement. Other factors important to UHR are the choice of anesthesia and smoking cessation for elective repair. Though we do not contest well-designed randomized controlled trials (RTCs), or clinical guidelines, we offer our perspective on the care of these common hernias.

Indexed as

epigastric herniaincisional herniaRichter’s herniaventral hernia

Identifiers

PMID40944083
PMCPMC12429212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.