ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Elective Umbilical Hernia Repair in Adults in the 21st Century: Challenging the Status Quo.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of general anesthesia vs. local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care for elective umbilical hernia repair in adults: a propensity score- matched analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On the spectrum of complexity for general surgery operations, umbilical hernia repair (UHR) is on the light side. After inguinal hernias, they are the most commonly repaired hernias and, as such, umbilical hernias are an important component of a general surgery practice. Since the time at which WJ Mayo published his seminal technique on the repair of umbilical hernias, multiple strategies for the management of umbilical hernias have emerged ranging from watchful waiting to open repair, as well as minimally invasive approaches. The present perspective maintains that each approach has its merits depending on the patient, surgeon, and institution. However, randomized controlled trials and clinical practice guidelines have favored some approaches over others. Similarly, recommendations have been developed regarding body mass index classification as well as hernia size for mesh placement. Other factors important to UHR are the choice of anesthesia and smoking cessation for elective repair. Though we do not contest well-designed randomized controlled trials (RTCs), or clinical guidelines, we offer our perspective on the care of these common hernias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.