ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Presbyopia is a ubiquitous age-related condition characterized by reduced near focusing ability due to lenticular stiffening. Pharmacologic agents such as pilocarpine have re-emerged as a less-invasive treatment option by inducing miosis and thereby enhancing depth of focus. However, the optimal pharmacologically induced pupil size that balances improved near vision with sufficient retinal illuminance remains undetermined. In this work, we present for the first time a direct integration of advanced theoretical modeling with a systematic synthesis of clinical trial outcomes to define the optimal target pupil size for pharmacologic presbyopia correction. We modeled visual performance using the Visual Strehl Ratio of the Optical Transfer Function (VSOTF) and convolved images of optotypes across a range of pupil diameters from 1.5 mm to 3.5 mm. This combined optical-clinical approach allowed us to quantitatively compare modeled image quality and depth of focus predictions with real-world clinical efficacy data from pilocarpine-based interventions. Simulations showed that smaller pupil sizes (1.5-2.5 mm) significantly extended depth of focus compared to standard multifocal optics while maintaining image quality within acceptable limits. These findings align with clinical trials of pilocarpine formulations, which commonly achieve post-treatment pupil diameters in the 2.0-2.5 mm range and are associated with clinically meaningful gains in near vision. Our analysis uniquely demonstrates that these clinically achieved pupil sizes closely match the theoretically optimal 2.0-3.0 mm range identified in our modeling, strengthening the evidence base for drug design and patient selection. These results reinforce the role of pharmacologically controlled pupil size as a central target in presbyopia management. By explicitly linking predictive optical modeling with aggregated clinical outcomes, we introduce a novel framework to guide future pharmacologic development strategies and refine clinical counseling in the emerging era of presbyopia therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.